glimmer

From: Wade T. Smith (wade.t.smith@verizon.net)
Date: Sun 25 May 2003 - 19:40:04 GMT

  • Next message: joedees@bellsouth.net: "Re: glimmer"

    On Sunday, May 25, 2003, at 02:58 PM, Joe wrote:

    > The specific symbol strings encode the selfsame message in different
    > performances, requiring different knowledges to transmit and receive

    That is _almost_ the situation in the performance model of cultural evolution. What is needed is a change of one word-

    "The specific symbol strings encode the selfsame message in different performances, requiring similar knowledges to transmit and receive."

    And, quite honestly, I cannot fathom how people with different knowledges could transmit and receive the selfsame message. A deaf person would say 'hello' in sign language, and a speaking person would not know what this action was. And yet your model would seem to claim that 'hello' would be communicated? How does this happen?

    If a person were to show me the result of '8x9' on their abacus, I would not know they meant '72' unless I had knowledge of how an abacus works, and I don't. Once supplied with this similar knowledge about the workings of an abacus, I can 'see' '72' upon one, but, not before.

    - Wade

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun 25 May 2003 - 19:46:39 GMT