Re: transmission

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Sun 25 May 2003 - 18:12:58 GMT

  • Next message: Douglas Brooker: "Re: transmission"

    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    > Kenneth,
    > > > Joe, I think Wade is trying to say that by writing a letter the
    > > > idea of having a service to mail it is included_ the one can 't
    > > > exclude the other. And yes, before a letter is mailed it is still
    > > > a letter by definition but not by ' meaning ', it isn 't mailed !
    > > > There is a tic and tac about this kind of stuff.
    > Joe,
    > > Of course one knows how to communicate (speak, write) when one
    > > forms the intention to do so. But one DOES form the intention to
    > > communicate, and more than that, to communicate specific
    > > information; information that one cognitively holds before one
    > > communicates it, as cognitive memes.
    >
    > Yes, but venue- effects can be prior to the actual intention to write
    > ! The writing, the intention to communicate can be seen as just a
    > second stage of an already evolving venue- scheme. The actual forming
    > of the intention to communicate can be induced by the moments of
    > activity of the venue.
    >
    > The venue cannot know what kind of people were to be around the
    > fire when one is saying there is a bear in the berry patch, but the
    > actual fact that some will hunt the beast and that others will stay
    > put are already ' performed ' performances within that specific kind
    > of venue. The people around the fire do not have to form anything_
    > culture main- tains the controls of recognizable performances within
    > itself.
    >
    > Fleeing is one, hunting is another and staying put is yet one other,
    > but to culture is doesn 't matter who is running, hunting and who is
    > staying indoors. When the moment was there one was saying there was a
    > bear, all above performances were once more ' performed ', culture
    > remains, the persistence of this performances was asured.
    >
    > There was no forming of intention to hunt, or to flee or to stay put_
    > culture commands and demands that performances must be performed, if
    > you go hunting, if I flee and if Wade will stay put, to culture it
    > doesn 't matter. What happens internally to the three of us, are
    > results of already socio- biological conditioning (a)effects.
    >
    Once again, I can communicate the date of my birthday to a common language speaker on the equator or on either pole.
    >
    > Kenneth,
    > > > What's the point of having a mail service if noone ever writes
    > > > letters that were to be mailed !? Within the concept of writing a
    > > > letter and having the intention to mail it, the idea of a mail
    > > > service is part of the equation.
    > Joe,
    > > But one must have concept and intention, and those are internal
    > > things.
    >
    > No, if you write a nasty letter to me and I reply, where is my
    > intention !? You, the venue induced it upon me ! Before the fact of
    > receiving your letter there was no concept, no intention. The only
    > internal thing I have, so to speak, is the recognizability that you
    > wrote a nasty letter to me and I can 't have that and I replied. The
    > actual fact that you wrote a nasty letter in the first can have a 1000
    > reasons or more, but carefully examined was it your intention !? Or
    > was it induced by the recognizable- ability you have, in turn in-
    > duced by cultural/ social etc venues !?
    >
    > It is the continuance of cultural/ social etc performances that induce
    > venues to command/ demand for yet anew performances, the letters we
    > write to eachother are such performances. Unless one cease to write,
    > yet another venue, or venues don 't ask/ command/ demands that we
    > write, the performances will stop or will survive.
    >
    > There is still a coca and a cola between the lines........
    >
    There is still the perception and the interpretation of the stimulus preceding any responsive action, and these are internal, cognitive things.
    >
    > Regards though,
    >
    > Kenneth
    >
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun 25 May 2003 - 18:18:17 GMT