Re: transmission

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Thu 22 May 2003 - 02:06:39 GMT

  • Next message: joedees@bellsouth.net: "Re: performance"

    > on 5/21/03 7:11 PM, joedees@bellsouth.net at joedees@bellsouth.net
    > wrote:
    >
    > [snip]
    >
    > >>
    > >> Applying a biological analogy to human culture and communication
    > >> does not magically transfer biology's explanatory efficacy to
    > >> psychology. It gives the illusion of understanding but not the
    > >> power. It's a con.
    > >>
    > > We DO know that information that Jack had that Jill did not have was
    > > transferred from jack to Jill. We know the semiotics and the
    > > genetic epistemology of the sigh-referent associations, and we know
    > > the power of language to allow these referents to be intentionally
    > > arranged in novel and meaningful strings which are coded in a
    > > commonly understood language.
    >
    > Semiotics and genetic epistemology are interesting, but fall short on
    > details and mechanisms. This won't do.
    >
    Together with hhenomenology and hermeneutics, they form the basis of current philosophical thought - the very things that ground the sciences, which cannot be self-grounding.
    >
    > > . . . . If that is not information transmission, then it
    > > does not exist, and you are simply indulging in a solipsistic dream
    > > when you type your objections to your alter ego. The 'how' is
    > > basically known, requiring only fine-tuning, as is the 'where' (the
    > > temporal lobes and association cortex and the mouth-ear nexus
    > > (hijacked by a second- order mutation, according to Philip
    > > Lieberman, from the hand-eye coordination system), including Broca's
    > > and Wernicke's areas and their connection via the arcuate
    > > fasciculus; the 'what' is rationally indisputable.
    >
    > All of which is to say that you can't do what I asked you to do. You
    > have little idea of what's going on. --
    >
    More than you do, appparently, for you seem unwilling to admit that ANYTHING necessary or essential is going on in there; even though it is surpassingly obvious that what goes on between cannot proceed in the absence of what goes on within.
    >
    > William L. Benzon
    > 708 Jersey Avenue, Apt. 2A
    > Jersey City, NJ 07302
    > 201 217-1010
    >
    > "You won't get a wild heroic ride to heaven on pretty little
    > sounds."--George Ives
    >
    > Mind-Culture Coevolution: http://asweknowit.ca/evcult/
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu 22 May 2003 - 02:11:58 GMT