Re: cats in a box

• Previous message: joedees@bellsouth.net: "Re: more cats"
• In reply to: Wade T. Smith: "cats in a box"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

>
> On Wednesday, May 21, 2003, at 01:13 AM, memetics-digest wrote:
>
> > Thus, you are
> > asking for verification of the state of Heisenberg's cat before the
> > box is opened.
>
> That would Schroedigger's cat.
>
Almost right (and I was wrong); it is Schrodinger's cat.
>
> It's not that I'm wanting to know if the poor puss is dead or alive,
> but, I'm still wanting to know you put a damn cat in the box in the
> first place.
>
> From what you've shown me, I think it's a flim-flam, and there ain't
> no
> cat.
>
The cat has to be in my brian-box for me to let it out (as I'm doing now by telling you about it.
>
> - Wade
>
>
> ===============================================================
> This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
> Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
> For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
> see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
>

=============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

• Next message: Reed Konsler: "performance"
• Previous message: joedees@bellsouth.net: "Re: more cats"
• In reply to: Wade T. Smith: "cats in a box"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed 21 May 2003 - 18:19:40 GMT