Re: more cats

• Previous message: joedees@bellsouth.net: "Re: throwing tomatoes"
• In reply to: Wade T. Smith: "more cats"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

>
> On Wednesday, May 21, 2003, at 01:13 AM, memetics-digest wrote:
>
> > I already demonstrated that with my 'wedding proposal' post
>
> Hmmm. I did not see that one. I certainly would have remembered such
> an invitation.
>
> It's all well and good to post messages and then say you've managed to
> convey some sort of information, but, unless you've done the
> performance, whatever you think is the information is moot, and you
> can't show it to me.
>
> There is no cat, to be dead or alive.
>
Go to: http://cfpm.org/~majordom/memetics/2000/15024.html
>
> - Wade
>
>
> ===============================================================
> This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
> Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
> For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
> see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
>

=============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

• Next message: joedees@bellsouth.net: "Re: cats in a box"
• Previous message: joedees@bellsouth.net: "Re: throwing tomatoes"
• In reply to: Wade T. Smith: "more cats"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed 21 May 2003 - 18:17:58 GMT