Re: transmission

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Sun 18 May 2003 - 17:27:34 GMT

  • Next message: joedees@bellsouth.net: "Re: transmission"

    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    > > Deciding to drink one's thousandth beer is very different from a
    > > spider following a hard-wired instinctual program to weave its
    > > thousandth web; once again, one falls into the trap of implicitly
    > > denying conscious self- awareness and choice at the very moment one
    > > is exercising them.
    >
    > Taking all possibilities in consideration, no, that ain 't that
    > different. There is nothing that excludes the possibility that
    > drinking one's 1000 beer is just a hard- wired program than the
    > weaving of a web. Nothing excludes the possibility that one is hard-
    > wired for drinking beer, it could be just yet another construction of
    > a meme. Depending upon the cognitive gestalt different people will
    > perform differently, (drinking beer, wine, or smoke, drive fast, etc)
    > where in the same token, spiders will weave webs and lions will hunt
    > wilde- beasts.
    >
    > You seem to sweep what is human under a fundamental mistake,
    > a rug that provides us being on top of nature, where we are NOT !
    > Where addiction and neuroses are concerned will likely dismiss the
    > possibility that mandates that those can be essential, encoded hard
    > -wired within.
    >
    > If we take Wade's scheme, culture needs all of its performances
    > to be maintained, therefor drinking beer and making webs are
    > part of the same venue_ and in the same token, any meme, any
    > performance needs as many relations as it should and can have
    > to be memetically useful and continuing.
    > It is IMO, not important if beer drinking is hard- wired within
    > or making webs is biased on instinct or not, what seems to be
    > of importance is the continuance of these performances and
    > their related memetic constructs.
    >
    > Consciousness, is IMO of no major importance, the decision
    > so allegedly made by you, you think, can be just yet another
    > tool by which memes propagate and continue.
    > The decision addresses the process of procreation of one
    > particular cultural effect, drinking beer.
    >
    > Within the cultural mix it is an agency and an effect of memes
    > and performances at work_ memes and performances use
    > our consciousness to do their parasitic dirty- work.
    > While we think it was our decision to make, we deny the
    > memes their agency of " being selfish "_consciousness is
    > just a working model by which memes/ performances evolve,
    > ride and grant themselves within the mix.
    >
    > Regards,
    >
    > Kenneth
    >
    Sorry, Kenneth, but ALL spiders of web-weaving species produce silk, while within the human family there are imbibers and teetotalers.
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun 18 May 2003 - 17:33:30 GMT