Re: Jabbering !

From: Kenneth Van Oost (Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be)
Date: Thu Jun 08 2000 - 10:39:48 BST

  • Next message: Kenneth Van Oost: "Re: Jabbering !"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id QAA13827 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 8 Jun 2000 16:30:16 +0100
    Message-ID: <000c01bfd162$08ce4800$a402bed4@default>
    From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D31017458B1@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    Subject: Re: Jabbering !
    Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2000 11:39:48 +0200
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2000 12:00 PM
    Subject: RE: Jabbering !

    > Flying, swimming or walking from one place to another isn't communication.
    >
    > Migratory birds have senses which give them excellent spatial awareness
    > systems. What they don't do is phone up their dovecot for instructions on
    > how to get home (or look at a map)!

    << Of course, everybody knows that !
    But, what I meant is that Sheldrake has a theory which the dove ' connects '
    in some sense with their dovecot.
    He proposes that there might be a binding which implicates ' the not-local
    bands ' of quantum-fysics.
    For those under us, the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-paradox.
    What the truth is, I don' t know, but looking in those thing would end up
    maybe in some kind of answer, but I think this not really the subject of
    this
    list.
    We keep in mind though that everything we see and hear is not necessarily
    wrong or something to make jokes about.

    Regards,

    Kenneth

    (I am, because we are)
    >
    > How do dogs and cats know when their masters are coming home from work?
    Two
    > basic reasons for this. First it is Pavlovian, because work routines mean
    > that people return at roughly the same time day after day and the animal
    > tunes into that timeframe. Second, cat and dog senses in terms of scent
    and
    > sound are more acute than humans, so that the animals can here someone
    > coming up the path, or parking the car before any humans in the house.
    >
    > I did see a TV experiment once where they had a camera on a dog and a
    camera
    > on a person going out on random journeys, and the aim was to see how
    quickly
    > the dog realised that their owner was coming home. It appeared that as
    soon
    > as the owner decided to go home, the dog went to the front door. I can't
    > remember what the programme's explanation was (if it gave one). I think
    > there is also the factor here that is evident in things like clairvoyence-
    > we remember only those times the animal guesses correctly that the owner
    is
    > coming home, and not those times when they get it wrong.
    >
    > However, what is very clear again, is that the dog doesn't know it's owner
    > is coming home because it phoned them on their mobile phone a few minutes
    > before! :-)
    >
    > Vincent

    <<

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jun 08 2000 - 16:33:02 BST