Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id UAA10344 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 7 Jun 2000 20:33:35 +0100 Message-ID: <001d01bfd0ba$e2d704e0$6a00bed4@default> From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be> To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> References: <20000603033721.AAA5936@camailp.harvard.edu@[204.96.32.165]> <39383F6B.ABD29587@mediaone.net> Subject: Re: Jabbering ! Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 21:59:26 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
----- Original Message -----
From: Chuck <cpalson@mediaone.net>
To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2000 1:12 AM
Subject: Re: Jabbering !
>
>
> "Wade T.Smith" wrote:
>
> > >I wonder if Richard, for example, would say
> > >that about himself.
> >
> > I would wonder, and wonder well, about _anyone_ who says they really,
> > really, know why they do something.
> >
> > Because they would be lying.
<< Why should we be lying if we ,really, really don't know if we are lying
or
not !?
Regards,
Kenneth
(I am, because we are)
> How do I know that's not a lie? But then again, what does "really,
> really" mean. Does an adequate theory qualify?
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jun 07 2000 - 20:34:13 BST