Re: Jabbering !

From: Chuck (cpalson@mediaone.net)
Date: Sat Jun 03 2000 - 00:12:44 BST

  • Next message: Chuck: "Re: Cui bono, Chuck?" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id FAA16973 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 3 Jun 2000 05:14:39 +0100
Message-ID: <39383F6B.ABD29587@mediaone.net>
Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2000 00:12:44 +0100
From: Chuck <cpalson@mediaone.net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (WinNT; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Subject: Re: Jabbering !
References: <20000603033721.AAA5936@camailp.harvard.edu@[204.96.32.165]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    "Wade T.Smith" wrote:

    > >I wonder if Richard, for example, would say
    > >that about himself.
    >
    > I would wonder, and wonder well, about _anyone_ who says they really,
    > really, know why they do something.
    >
    > Because they would be lying.

    How do I know that's not a lie? But then again, what does "really,
    really" mean. Does an adequate theory qualify?

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 03 2000 - 05:15:16 BST