From: Wade T. Smith (wade.t.smith@verizon.net)
Date: Thu 01 May 2003 - 15:07:29 GMT
On Thursday, May 1, 2003, at 08:12 AM, memetics-digest wrote:
> I mean that (for example) when catching a cricket
> ball you _do not_ do the maths, you just match to your previous
> experiences of catching (and the eidos of it you have refined over the
> years - in effect a fully functional toy/model of the behaviour, built
> by tuning though, not metrication).
That _is_ 'doing the maths'. We are _built_ to 'do the maths'. We _do_
the maths. We correspond with physical reality which has to follow
physical laws. 'Maths' just explain what we do in another form.
- Wade
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu 01 May 2003 - 15:16:14 GMT