Re: memetics-digest V1 #1296

From: Van oost Kenneth (kennethvanoost@belgacom.net)
Date: Thu 06 Mar 2003 - 20:46:18 GMT

  • Next message: Van oost Kenneth: "Re: memetics-digest V1 #1304"

    ----- Original Message ----- From: "Grant Callaghan" <grantc4@hotmail.com> The level and type of civilization also becomes obvious. What a
    > particular person designed and used the object for is just a small part of
    > the information it is capable of transmitting.

    Seen from our todays perspective those types you talk about will be
    ' primitive ', " civilized " if they were set against their own space/ time but they will be never obvious. The use of the term implies contempt ( not implied I am sure) but we will never be sure about the " obviously " facts of any ancient civilisa- tion. Levels are always compared with things of today and that is some- thing we can 't do with ancient sociaties, they got their merite in their own space/ time. Denying that is historical and intellectual unjust.

    Kenneth

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu 06 Mar 2003 - 20:23:39 GMT