From: Grant Callaghan (grantc4@hotmail.com)
Date: Sun 02 Mar 2003 - 22:29:05 GMT
 >"Incidentally, Mrs Burke was lucky.  In Eskimo societies, to hoard is 
taboo.  Rich people who are ungenerous are sometimes killed."
Even in our Western society you can find people resentful of those who have 
more than the rest of us.  As soon as a man builds a business to the point 
where he can hire help, the help becomes labor and the man who built the 
business becomes management and attracts resentment in the process.  
Communism seemed to be mostly about resentment against the disparity between 
the rich and the poor.
In china, the (relatively) rich were exterminated by the millions.  Now 
they're looked up to in some degree, although how they got rich is a big 
factor in whether they are resented or not.  The theme I see in all of 
society seems to be the belief that people who gain more than others 
impoverish their neighbors by doing so.  Even when the prosperity of the 
neighborhood is the result of one man's success as building a business.  I 
was just reading today that the Town of Hershey is 100 years old and owes 
it's properity to the man who built the Hershey candy factory.
It's ironic that in the U.S., labor unions drove the price of labor so high 
that many industries moved their factories to other countries where labor 
was cheaper.  The laborers who worked in the factories resented the fact 
that they made less money than their supervisors and organized to reduce the 
disparity.  Now they resent the fact that they have priced themselves out of 
the labor market and no longer have jobs.
Today, China is getting rich off this movement of manufacturing, but at some 
point will meet the fate of Taiwan, which was for a while the cheapest 
skilled labor in the Far East but have lately entered  a recession brought 
on by their relatively high labor cost and manufacturing facilities having 
moved to the mainland.  The same can be said of Japan and Hongkong.
It looks to me like a worldwide cycle.  Money chases cheap labor and said 
labor wants to be rich.  When labor becomes too expensive, manufacturing 
moves on in search of cheaper labor again.  The driving force behind this 
cycle appears to be human nature and the resentment of people who are richer 
than we are.  What will we do when machines take over all manufacturing?  
Can people compete with that?
Grant
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun 02 Mar 2003 - 22:25:54 GMT