RE: What is "useful"; what is "survival"

From: Richard Brodie (richard@brodietech.com)
Date: Sat Jun 03 2000 - 22:23:39 BST

  • Next message: Chuck: "Re: Jabbering !"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id WAA20971 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 3 Jun 2000 22:25:43 +0100
    From: "Richard Brodie" <richard@brodietech.com>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: What is "useful"; what is "survival"
    Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2000 14:23:39 -0700
    Message-ID: <NBBBIIDKHCMGAIPMFFPJCEJIEOAA.richard@brodietech.com>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
    Importance: Normal
    In-Reply-To: <39384B8B.29C22511@mediaone.net>
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Chuck wrote:

    <<Do weathermen predict the future? How well do they understand the
    weather?>>

    Yes of course they predict the future and understand the weather... that's
    their job. What's your point?

    [RB]
    > Assuming you are talking about memetics, let me ask you a question. Do you
    > think every person to use steel independently invented steel in response
    to
    > a changing ecology? Or did the idea of steel spread rapidly once invented
    > once or a handful of times, filling a cultural niche?

    <<As I said in a previous post, one could indeed say that each person
    "invents"
    it.>>

    So you see no distinction between coming up with a novel innovation on one's
    own and learning about it from someone who already has the knowledge? Isn't
    one a lot more difficult and rare?

    << But did it spread rapidly or was it invented a handful of times? It's
    very
    hard to know - the debate has been around for about 150 years. But these
    days
    they are finding more and more evidence for the latter. On a really complex
    invention, though, remember that it pays to keep the process a secret.
    Producing
    bronze, for example, is a complex process. It was invented on one island in
    the
    Mediterranean Sea, and there it stayed; it was the source of bronze for the
    entire Mediterranean. That may be because the exact minerals only resided
    there
    and there were lots of trees for fuel (the island is now treeless precisely
    because it was all used up). Another example that comes to mind are
    navigational
    charts during the Age of Discovery - they were so valuable that they were
    kept
    secret.>>

    An interesting story. I'd love to sit and listen to your stories some time.
    But the question was whether you acknowledge that information spread
    memetically throughout a culture.

    [RB]
     I tend not to
    > believe you when you say that something is too complicated to understand
    > without reading volumes of stuff. Richard Feynman always said that anyone
    > who couldn't express the essence an idea in a sentence or two didn't
    really
    > have a clear idea.

    <<But I DID express the essence by expressing in several words the basic
    "principle." And it's not just the environment per se that's important, but
    the
    principles by which we respond to it.>>

    I must have missed it. Could you please repeat the essence of your theory
    that conflicts with memetics?

    > [RB]
    > > Frankly I've never heard anyone else on this list, other than you,
    express
    > > distaste for technological progress.
    >
    [CP]
    > <<You evidently aren't reading some of the posts -- or at least not very
    > carefully.>>
    >
    [RB]
    > This is another thing you do that lessens your credibility in my eyes. I
    > believe you have a pattern that, when challenged, you tend to point to
    > unspecified prior posts rather than answering the challenge directly. I
    > always assume, when you do that, that you are wrong but don't want to
    admit
    > it.

    <<Sorry - I don't have the time to go back to find them. I remember at least
    two
    of them at the moment, and the work of Blackmore is saturated with the
    bias.>>

    As I remember you didn't get much agreement on that. And I think it's odd to
    claim that a discussion conducted exclusively by email is populated by
    people biased against technology.

    Richard Brodie richard@brodietech.com www.memecentral.com/rbrodie.htm

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 03 2000 - 22:26:19 BST