Re: Cui bono, Chuck?

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Sat Jun 03 2000 - 15:15:54 BST

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Re: Jabbering !" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id PAA18962 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 3 Jun 2000 15:18:22 +0100
Subject: Re: Cui bono, Chuck?
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2000 10:15:54 -0400
x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu
x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-ID: <20000603141552.AAA6303@camailp.harvard.edu@[204.96.32.109]>
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    Chuck made this comment not too long ago --

    >Again - how does your theory of Evangelistic religions compare with
    >others? Lots
    >of people predicted this with different theories.

    I seem to remember 'If This Goes On....' by Heinlein from back in, oh,
    the 50's somewhere....

    Not to discount anybody's anything, but, predicting the obvious ("What is
    the obvious?" said Pilate, and washed his hands....) is not science.

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jun 03 2000 - 15:18:57 BST