RE: Another "Example" of the Radical Islam Memeplex

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Sun 15 Dec 2002 - 19:36:47 GMT

  • Next message: Lawrence DeBivort: "RE: Another Example of the Radical Islam Memeplex"

    > Actually, Joe, given your difficulty with sources, (and such things as
    > your yet unreported disclosure of just WHO is behind the MEMRI site,
    > as well as WHO has criricized me regarding my sources, as you accused
    > some time ago and seem to be trying to now forget), I would prefer
    > simply that you post your own views, deeply bigoted as I find them to
    > me, and cease trying to find others to bolster your case. You, after
    > all, are your own primary source.
    >
    Ad hominem again; you only find my views bigotedf because they do not conform to your own obvious prejudices. My sources have been enumerated countless times here; you cannot even number yours. ASnd no, I WILL NOT stop posting what malicious Islamofascist memebots are saying about us infidels, in their own words, whether it pops your "noble oppressed Muslim" fantasy memebubble or not.
    >
    > > -----Original Message-----
    > > From: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk [mailto:fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk]On
    > > Behalf Of joedees@bellsouth.net Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2002 1:51
    > > PM To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk Subject: RE: Another "Example" of the
    > > Radical Islam Memeplex
    > >
    > >
    > > > But there's the rub, Joe. These sites are not about 'truth' but
    > > > about persuasion. They use the tactics of propaganda. Just to be
    > > > clear: I am not just referring to pro-Israeli or anti-Islamic
    > > > sites, but to pro-Arab and anti-Israeli sites as well.
    > > >
    > > > That is precisely why primary sites and a comprehensive
    > > > consideration of the issues are vital. In your biased postings of
    > > > anti-Muslim and pro-Israeli materials and in your reluctance to
    > > > answer our specific questions about them, you put yourself in a
    > > > position of just being a megaphone to the propagandists. There is
    > > > not doubt that you believe that what you say is truthful, but that
    > > > is precisely the aim of propaganda -- to get otherwise naive
    > > > people repeating the propaganda as if it were the truth.
    > > >
    > > I'm sorry for your torturous path to disillusionment, but you
    > > simply can't
    > > get around the fact that those are actual broadcasts that were
    > > beamed into Middle East homes on the dates and by the stations
    > > provided. No one else needs to propagandize against them - just let
    > > them speak for themselves; their own actual words reveal their
    > > bilous hatred and their commitment to infecting their infants with
    > > it much more effectively than anything a propagandist could
    > > manufacture. You complain when I post not my words, but their own.
    >
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun 15 Dec 2002 - 19:37:53 GMT