From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Thu 12 Dec 2002 - 04:17:31 GMT
In Praise of Bin Laden
Some Saudi Schools Teach Students to Hate the U.S., Love Osama
Reporter's Notebook
By Jim Sciutto
Dec. 10
— The Saudi government insists religious extremism is not sanctioned
in the kingdom, and that it's not taught in schools. But it is easy to find
teachers who speak out against the United States with a surprisingly
deep hatred — a sentiment many are passing on to their students.
Getting these teachers to speak on the record, and especially on
camera, is difficult.
On a trip to Riyadh, ABCNEWS producer Hoda Abdel-Hamid and I met
three teachers who work at a private high school for boys just outside
the capital. And although we've frequently witnessed the depth of anti-
American feeling in this part of the world, both of us were amazed at
what we heard from these men during our interview.
All three teachers are personally connected to the terror war. Each has
a brother in U.S. custody at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba, suspected of
supporting terrorism.
"I do not know if he was with al Qaeda or not," said Saad al-Shabbani,
whose 20-year-old brother, Fahad, is a detainee at Guantanamo. "He is
a young man, I don't think he was part of any group specifically. But
with the events unfolding he wanted to serve Islam."
‘If Someone Kills My Muslim Brother, I Can Kill Him’
Whether their brothers are actually tied to al Qaeda, all three teachers
are teaching their students — Saudi teenagers — that al Qaeda is a
noble cause. Here's an exchange with Mohammed Al-Osman, another
teacher:
ABCNEWS' Jim Sciutto: Do you believe Osama bin Laden is a good
man?
Mohammed Al-Osman: Undoubtedly.
Sciutto: He's a good man, even for planning these attacks on civilians in
the U.S., and the Koran says attacks on civilians are not justified?
Al-Osman: Three thousand Americans were killed, but many Muslims
also died in Afghanistan. I tell my students the Koran allows self-
defense, so if the U.S. kills civilians, then sometimes we have to kill
civilians.
Sciutto: What I'm hearing from you is that you're telling your students
they can kill people because they're angry.
Al-Osman: If someone kills my Muslim brother, I can kill him.
Sciutto: The people in the World Trade Center, they didn't kill your
brothers.
Al-Osman: If I can't target the enemy who did wrong, then I can sacrifice
other people.
Al-Shabbani echoed this sentiment.
Sciutto: "You have described to me a very sad future. If someone
attacks you, you attack them. They attack you, you attack them. What
future are you teaching your students — about violence, about killing,
constant killing?"
Al-Shabbani: I teach my students that sometimes you have to do
injustice to people who have done an injustice to you.
Pointing Fingers at Israel
When confronted with statements like these, Saudi officials say they're
the views of a small minority. But they concede these views are being
promoted by extremist religious teachers, and even in some school
textbooks.
During a visit to Saudi Arabia this summer, ABCNEWS' 20/20 came
across one high school textbook with a passage reading: "Judgment
Day will come only when Muslims kill Jews in a great war."
Saudi officials say they've identified parts of the official school
curriculum that are inflammatory and that they're changing them. But
they also say that the root of anti-American feeling here is not in the
schools, but in U.S. Mideast policy. Specifically, says Foreign Minister
Saud al-Faisal, the Bush administration's unflagging support for Israel
and Prime Minister Ariel Sharon.
"The schools are teaching the same subjects that they did 10 years
ago, 20 years ago, 30 years ago," said al-Faisal. "What has changed is
American policy. It is perceived that America is standing unjustly with
Mr. Sharon."
The teachers we met, like many people in the Arab world, hold the
United States responsible for Palestinian civilian deaths in the Israeli
conflict, because Israel buys its weapons from the United States and
also receives financial support from Washington.
Many here also frequently point out that the U.S. military campaign in
Afghanistan left civilians dead — justification, they say, for al Qaeda's
attacks on American civilians.
Al-Osman attempted to justify the World Trade Center attacks in the
following exchange:
Sciutto: There were civilian casualties in Afghanistan. But the American
goal was not to kill civilians. They wanted to go after soldiers and
accidently killed civilians. Osama bin Laden's goal was to kill civilians.
His plan was to kill civilians. Isn't that a difference?
Al-Osman: Bin Laden wanted to hit a building, the World Trade Center,
that represented the American economy.
Sciutto: Yes, but that building happened to be filled by civilians. He
drove the plane into the building to kill civilians. Do you deny that?
Al-Osman: Al Qaeda was going after a symbol.
Sciutto: But that building, that symbol, happened to be full of people. Is
that right?
Al-Osman: It's not necessary to give a warning of the attack so that
people could flee the building that day.
Sciutto: So you're saying that it's OK to surprise civilians in the building.
Al-Osman: In this case, yes.
As for the men ABCNEWS interviewed, we were told privately many
times that a crackdown on teachers like them would anger powerful
religious extremists here. And so many Saudi students are still being
taught to hate Americans, and even to kill them.
(Joe) What is really amazing is that these memebots attempt to use the
collateral damage loss of Afghan civilians to justify the 9/11 atrocity,
even though that occurred BEFORE the US pursued the planners into
Afghanistan.
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu 12 Dec 2002 - 04:18:51 GMT