Re: Cui Bono Chuck?

From: Aaron Lynch (aaron@mcs.net)
Date: Fri Jun 02 2000 - 21:09:56 BST

  • Next message: Chuck: "Re: Jabbering !"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id VAA14764 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 2 Jun 2000 21:13:02 +0100
    Message-Id: <4.3.1.0.20000602144702.02359470@popmail.mcs.net>
    X-Sender: aaron@popmail.mcs.net
    X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1
    Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2000 15:09:56 -0500
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    From: Aaron Lynch <aaron@mcs.net>
    Subject: Re: Cui Bono Chuck?
    In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.4.21.0006021258510.29909-100000@frost.umd.edu>
    References: <4.3.1.0.20000602094735.022ed340@popmail.mcs.net>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    At 01:00 PM 6/2/00 -0400, Lawrence H. de Bivort wrote:

    >Aaron, if I may crudely summarize: are you saying that Christians in Roman
    >times simply out-populated non-Christians, rather than increase their
    >numbers through conversion?

    Lawrence,

    No, I am saying that both parent to child transmission and peer to peer
    transmission (as well as ideological and physical preservation effects)
    account for Christians coming to out-number non-Christians. My book
    discusses a variety of both peer to peer and parent to child mechanisms,
    along with faith-preservation mechanisms and survival mechanisms. Stark,
    whose book came out the same year mine did, was actually finding ancient
    evidence that happens to back my evolutionary hypotheses of both peer to
    peer and parent to child transmission playing important roles. Stark
    documents how Christianity rose in prevalence without looking at it as a
    form of natural selection.

    Many would label parent to child propagation as "natural increase," but I
    find no more reason to call this "natural" than to call peer to peer
    persuasion "natural." Mathematically, parent to child is treated in the
    first two terms of my differential equations, while peer to peer is treated
    in the third and fourth terms of my differential equations. Those terms
    take different forms, but do not imply any special status as "natural" for
    parental transmission.

    --Aaron Lynch

    PS, What is the Evolutionary Services Institute? It sounds interesting.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 02 2000 - 21:13:43 BST