Re: Cui Bono Chuck?

From: Paul marsden (paulsmarsden@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Jun 02 2000 - 08:36:12 BST

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: What is it good for?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id IAA10903 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 2 Jun 2000 08:38:45 +0100
    Message-ID: <20000602073612.76760.qmail@hotmail.com>
    X-Originating-IP: [212.140.158.93]
    From: "Paul marsden" <paulsmarsden@hotmail.com>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Cui Bono Chuck?
    Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2000 00:36:12 PDT
    Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    >So perhaps you can explain to me why Aaron finds an advantage to memic
    >theory in explaining birth rates?

    Aaron is a vociferous defender of his own model, but the purchase or insight
    that he offered was that in addition to being a product of
    a) an ultimate rationale of inclusive genetic fitness
    b) constraints and opportunities provided by economic relations

    there is a third stance or perspective

    c)in which cultural instructions may be understood as influencing fertility
    levels.

    Catholics do have more children than Protestants. Likewise, without
    invoking cultural influences its damned difficult to explain blood donation
    or any other anonymous charity – but a memetic theory of altruism can do
    this. See Paul Allison’s excellent account of this.

    Although most social scientists would boggle at all this and say of course
    culture has an influence independent of genes (and more problematically
    economic relations), unless, that is, they are into crude genetic
    reductionism/determinism or economic determinism, but what memetics does is
    to bring a particular organising principle and focus into cultural dynamics:

    SPECIFICALLY – SOME CULTURE SELF-EMPLACES, THAT IS, ITS EFFECTS ARE
    CONDUCIVE TO ITS OWN REPRODUCTION. IN OTHER WORDS, MANIFESTING A CULTURAL
    INSTRUCTION BEHAVIOURALLY CAN MAKE THE RECURRENCE OF THAT CULTURAL
    INSTRUCTION MORE LIKELY BECAUSE THE ENVIRONMENT HAS BEEN MODIFIED IN SUCH A
    WAY TO ALLOW FOR THIS CHANGE.

    And no, this is not a panacea for social science, it is just one more way of
    looking at some aspects of the world to try and make sense of what is going
    on – there are many ways to skin a cat. Maybe this memetic stance doesn’t
    help you, but it has helped me understand suicide, and the peculiar
    phenomenon of suicide contagion (suicide levels jump by up to 10% following
    media coverage of celebrity suicides)

    ________________________________________________________________________
    Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 02 2000 - 08:39:22 BST