Re: Fwd: [COMPLEX-M] "Intelligent Design" lobby Congress against Darwinism

From: Aaron Lynch (aaron@mcs.net)
Date: Fri Jun 02 2000 - 03:52:04 BST

  • Next message: Paul marsden: "Re: Cui Bono Chuck?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id DAA09957 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 2 Jun 2000 03:55:51 +0100
    Message-Id: <4.3.1.0.20000601214043.00d499d0@popmail.mcs.net>
    X-Sender: aaron@popmail.mcs.net
    X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1
    Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2000 21:52:04 -0500
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    From: Aaron Lynch <aaron@mcs.net>
    Subject: Re: Fwd: [COMPLEX-M] "Intelligent Design" lobby Congress against Darwinism
    Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=====================_29480950==_.ALT"
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed

    Thank you for forwarding this material, Ilfryn.

    I also spoke about evolution in the Seattle area last month--at a less
    public event--and addressed some of the Darwinian processes that ironically
    gave rise to the Congressional hearings and the other anti-Darwinian
    actions taken at state and local levels in the USA. My talk, titled "Human
    Destiny and the Evolutionary Epidemiology of Ideas," was given at the May
    18-19 Cultural Evolution Workshop of the Foundation for the Future's Center
    for Human Evolution in Bellevue, WA.

    The section where I discussed certain forces in the evolutionary
    epidemiology of ideas that give rise to growing anti-Darwinism reads as
    follows:

    "...In the area of religious belief, ideas that cause adherents to have
    more children, or to engage in more evangelism, or to shut out alternative
    ideas tend to gain population over time. Having children and evangelizing
    are examples of transmissivity, while shutting out alternative ideas
    confers longevity of belief. One consequence of the cultural evolution
    forces favoring large family sizes is overpopulation and consequent
    environmental degradation around the world. In addition, evangelical
    Christianity has gained enormous influence in recent decades here in the
    United States by growing at just 2.5% per year. As a fraction of the
    growing US population, this amounts to 0.5% per year, with the current
    prevalence at 44%. [footnote 5] Among the consequences are interference
    with the teaching of evolution theory. Decreased availability of abortion
    and contraception is has also apparently started to happen, especially for
    the poor. The widespread reading of the Book of Revelation has also led to
    dark paranoia about other countries and international organizations such as
    the United Nations. Such factors may threaten the prospects for peace and
    international cooperation. ..."

    I also discuss how the evolutionary epidemiology of ideas is eroding
    acceptance of evolution theory in my book Thought Contagion. The chapter
    "Successful Cults: Western Religion by Natural Selection" closes with the
    following:

    Religion and Science Revisited
             Numerous thinkers have suggested that modern scientific knowledge
    would push all religion toward extinction. Yet old religions continue to
    defy such forecasts. Moreover, new and vigorous religious movements
    continually form. Many once thought that the theory of evolution by natural
    selection would spell the end of religious myths. Yet the very phenomenon
    of evolution by natural selection easily propels religions past the minor
    challenges raised by scientific ideas. Even evolutionism loses popular
    ground to divine creationism in modern times.
             Memetic analysis of religion illuminates a stark contrast between
    religious and scientific thought: religious thought generally holds that
    certain special beliefs are divinely created. Memetic science contends that
    great religions evolve from a vast accumulation of observable, mundane,
    human actions. The creation-evolution conflict thus opens a new front: the
    origin of religions.

    Also somewhat ironically, the growth statistics quoted in my recent talk
    are consistent with the complex non-linear mathematics for the
    evolutionary epidemiology of ideas that I discuss in "Units, Events, and
    Dynamics in Memetic Evolution" at
    http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit/1998/vol2/lynch_a.html, and in the
    post-publication commentary at
    http://www.mcs.net/~aaron/UEDerrata_addenda.html. As noted in the
    post-publication commentary, none of this analysis depends upon having the
    word "meme": the whole paper can be re-titled "Units, Events, and Dynamics
    in the Evolutionary Epidemiology of Ideas," and, like the book, can be
    written without the word "meme."

    --Aaron Lynch

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 02 2000 - 03:56:28 BST