RE: Why Europe is so Contrary

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Sun 08 Dec 2002 - 10:28:16 GMT

  • Next message: Jeremy Bradley: "RE: Why Europe is so Contrary"

    > >> > Snip......Grant:
    > >> >> for example, seems to mark the begining and end of the
    > >> >> dynosaurs. Mitocondrial eve marks the beginning of mankind.
    > >> >> This way of looking at the universe seems so engrained in our
    > >> >> nature that it must occupy some deeper place in our makeup than
    > >> >> a cultural meme.
    > >> >>
    > >> >> Grant
    > >> >>
    > Jeremy:
    > >> > I don't think so Grant cos some cultures, mostly ones that we
    > >> > have defeated, had achieved stability and sustainability within
    > >> > their environments. These folk view 'development' as undesirable
    > >> > or bad. For them harmony with the nature that they found
    > >> > themselves in was the primary goal of existence. In all cases
    > >> > that I have found, such cultures have narrative patterning and
    > >> > content which predicates this cultural 'norm'. That's the short
    > >> > answer. Jeremy
    > >>
    > Grant:
    > >> Not many cultures that I am aware of have achieved this stability
    > >> with their environment, unless you include the possibility of 'die
    > >> back' when things are scarce. Most cultures expand to the extent of
    > >> their resources. If Hitler was not aware of this we would have been
    > >> spared WWII.
    > >>
    > Joe:
    > >Other examples of environmentally suicidal indigenous tribes are the
    > >ancient Easter Islanders and the Anasazi indians of the American
    > >southwest. It is a meme and a myth, kinda like the old 'noble
    > >savage', 'ancient sage' saw, that older cultures were always wiser.
    > >>
    >
    >
    > Jeremy:
    > Look Joe, I know that I am a devout environmentalist but the only
    > culture that I am aware of which could be described as
    > "environmentally suicidal" is our modern industrial one. Just to touch
    > the edges, if the 'developing nations' were to 'develop' to the stage
    > that the affluent West has it would cost us another three planets
    > worth of resources, and the pollution would have killed us long before
    > that anyway. Peace, simplicity, and environmental care are what we
    > need for sustainability. If we could achieve those goals I would say
    > that we had reached a highly evolved state. Only low animals foul
    > their surroundings and waste their resources Joe. I am not saying,
    > "older cultures were always wiser". What I am saying is that it is a
    > meme and a myth that newer cultures are always wiser. Jeremy
    >
    I just point out those two cultures as examples of cultures that killed themselves through depleting their available resources. It is a simple fact that they did, and they died; that makes them suicidal, even if unintentionally so.
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun 08 Dec 2002 - 10:30:08 GMT