RE: Lawrence of Arabia and the Sykes-Picot Agreement, revisited

From: Scott Chase (ecphoric@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri 06 Dec 2002 - 03:58:58 GMT

  • Next message: Dace: "Re: physics"

    >From: "Lawrence DeBivort" <debivort@umd5.umd.edu>
    >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    >Subject: RE: Lawrence of Arabia and the Sykes-Picot Agreement, revisited
    >Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 22:42:07 -0500
    >
    >Thanks for the recap, Scott, and the additional quotes.
    >
    >In the main, I think the movie was pretty accurate as to political and
    >military history. Even some of the more dramatic scenes are true to
    >history: the attack on Aqaba, the massacre of the retreating Turkish
    >column,
    >the entry into Jerusalem and Damascus.
    >
    Who was the first of the Allies to enter Damascus? According to David Fromkin's _A Peace to End All Peace_ (1989/2001. Henry Holt and Company. New York, p.337) it was the Aussies (cavalry). Was that in the movie?
    >
    >Cheers,
    >Lawry
    >
    > > -----Original Message-----
    > > From: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk [mailto:fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk]On Behalf
    > > Of Scott Chase
    > > Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 10:17 PM
    > > To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > > Subject: Re: Lawrence of Arabia and the Sykes-Picot Agreement, revisited
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > >From: "Grant Callaghan" <grantc4@hotmail.com>
    > > >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > > >To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > > >Subject: Re: Lawrence of Arabia and the Sykes-Picot Agreement,
    >revisited
    > > >Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 17:59:45 -0800
    > > >
    > > >>
    > > >>
    > > >>Some time ago, Grant (I think) posted an informative post in which as
    >an
    > > >>aside he suggested that Lawrence of Arabia had betrayed the Arabs by
    > > >>inducing them to revolt against the Ottomans for Arab independence,
    > > >>knowing
    > > >>that the British and French had signed a secret agreement in which
    >they
    > > >>carved up the area for their colonial aims. I posted a reply
    >indicating
    > > >>that
    > > >>Lawrence was innocent of this deception, as he had urged the revolt in
    > > >>1915
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >Sorry, Lawry, that wasn't mine.
    > > >
    > > I was mine. Lawry's been having troubles confusing the two of us.
    > > Could we
    > > be Siamese twin seperated at birth? Doppelgangers? I could be
    > > your sinister
    > > shadow projected each time you post...
    > >
    > > The post Lawry must have in mind:
    > >
    > > http://cfpm.org/~majordom/memetics/2000/12972.html
    > >
    > > was where I was ranting about contrarian Europe and the U.K. I
    > > made a couple
    > > MST3Kish movie references and then quite off the top of my head
    > > uttered the
    > > following:
    > >
    > > (bq)"If I were Irish reflecting on former English rule over my
    > > island (minus
    > > six counties) or an Arab who felt betrayed by T.E. Lawrence et al things
    > > might be different."(eq)
    > >
    > > Notice the "et al* after Lawrence. I was including Lawrence in a group
    >of
    > > people responsible for British policy towards the Arabs (aiding
    > > "The Revolt"
    > > and also for the behind the scenes maneuvering with France for post war
    > > spoils). I also said the the Arab might have felt betrayed, which is not
    > > exactly the same as being betrayed (perception versus reality).
    > > Lawry helped
    > > add more depth with his followup:
    > >
    > > http://cfpm.org/~majordom/memetics/2000/12973.html
    > >
    > > The issue of T.E. Lawrence's involvement in the Arab revolt and how
    > > Sykes-Picot fits in may be something to pursue. I'm no expert on
    > > Lawrence's
    > > bio. Robert Lacey in _The Kingdom: Arabia & the House of Saud_ (1981.
    > > Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publishers. New York) offers the
    > > following, which
    > > is more provocative than what I said:
    > >
    > > (bq) "...But the Sykes-Picot agreement clearly contradicted the spirit
    >of
    > > the Arab Revolt- why else had it been kept a secret?- and T. E.
    > > Lawrence, at
    > > least, never made any attempt to deny the deception in which he
    >knowingly
    > > participated:
    > >
    > > 'I risked the fraud', he wrote, 'on my conviction that Arab help was
    > > necessary to our cheap and speedy victory in the East, and that better
    >we
    > > win and break our word than lose.' Lawrence knew from the beginning that
    > > 'the promises to the Arabs were dead paper:..."(eq)
    > >
    > > The part that ends '...than lose.' is attributed by Lacey to page 24 of
    > > _Seven Pillars_. The part that ends '...were dead paper' appears
    > > contiguous
    > > to the following excerpt from _Seven Pillars_ and is attributed
    > > to page 283
    > > of _Seven Pillars_:
    > >
    > > (bq)"...Had I been an honourable adviser [he wrote] I would have
    > > sent my men
    > > home, and not let them risk their lives for such stuff. Yet the Arab
    > > inspiration was our main tool for winning the Eastern war. So I
    > > assured them
    > > that England kept her word in letter and spirit. In this comfort they
    > > performed their fine things: but, of course, instead of being
    > > proud of what
    > > we did together, I was continually and bitterly ashamed." (eq)
    > >
    > > Lacey's bibliography includes the 1935 edition of _Seven Pillars
    > > of Wisdom_
    > > (London:Cape).
    > >
    > > This quote from Lacey's book is from pages 134-5 and is indexed under
    > > "Lawrence, T. E... attempt to justify betrayal of Arab cause, 134-6"
    > > >
    > > >All I know about Lawrence of Arabia I saw on the big screen and I
    >didn't
    > > >believe half of it. ;-)
    > > >
    > > >
    > > I have the movie on DVD and wonder how far it departs from actual
    >history.
    > >
    > > _________________________________________________________________
    > > MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
    > > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
    > >
    > >
    > > ===============================================================
    > > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    > >
    >
    >
    >
    >===============================================================
    >This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    >Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    >For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    >see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    _________________________________________________________________ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri 06 Dec 2002 - 04:01:17 GMT