Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id RAA01444 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 31 May 2000 17:59:36 +0100 Message-ID: <B6E47FBD3879D31192AD009027AC929C36890A@NWTH-EXCHANGE> From: Bruce Jones <BruceJ@nwths.com> To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Subject: RE: Primate Rights Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 12:05:07 -0500 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Spight [SMTP:bspight@pacbell.net]
> Subject: Re: Primate Rights
>
> Dear Lawrence,
>
> > I wonder why chimpanzes would not have grammar in the wild. Is the
> > suggestion that they 'learn' grammatical construction from their human
> > contacts?
[BJ] Who says there is no grammatical construction in a chimps
language? Grammatical syntax is culture and language dependent. English
differs from German, Russian, Arabic, etc. based on the culture of the
language. Until someone speaks fluent "native" chimpanzee we will not be
able to determine the structure of the language.
When you learn a new language do you always get the syntax correct?
Probably not because you are building your interpretation of the language on
your own languages syntax .... same with chimps.
[BJ]
IMHO
Bruce Jones
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 31 2000 - 18:00:10 BST