Re: Cui bono, Chuck?

From: chuck (cpalson@mediaone.net)
Date: Tue May 30 2000 - 11:51:22 BST

  • Next message: Richard Brodie: "RE: Cui bono, Chuck?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id QAA02025 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 30 May 2000 16:53:14 +0100
    Message-ID: <39339D2A.CD8D770@mediaone.net>
    Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 11:51:22 +0100
    From: chuck <cpalson@mediaone.net>
    X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (WinNT; I)
    X-Accept-Language: en
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Cui bono, Chuck?
    References: <NBBBIIDKHCMGAIPMFFPJGEDJEOAA.richard@brodietech.com>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Richard Brodie wrote:

    > Chuck wrote:
    >
    > <<But from a cultural
    > perspective, [Weber's] work is excellent in showing how the culture
    > developing to
    > accommodate capitalism was a practical effort to develop the conceptual
    > tools
    > necessary to live in a capitalist society.>>
    >
    > Like the development of the giraffe's neck was a practical effort to develop
    > the biological tools necessary to munch on high branches?
    >
    > Who was the designer?

    Are you seriously suggesting that I can't distinguish between the mechanisms
    responsible for longer giraffe necks and cultural change are the same? If so, I
    suggest you go back and reread countless many of my past postings on this
    listserv. I would also suggest that you *carefully* read Pinker's How the Mind
    Works before you compulsively and automatically reject any notion that culture
    is a practical tool for problem solution. I suspect that your own tendency to
    automatically discard such a possibility reflects more your state of mind living
    in Southern California than anything about the nature of culture. It was you,
    after all, that said that memics - and your book - is really only a tool for
    getting people to think about their behavior and hardly a scientific viewpoint.
    In other words, memics itself is a cultural construction fashioned by you to
    resolve problems you deem important. Do you really want to claim now that all
    your memic productions are just invisible gremlines seeking parasitic
    relationships with as many brains as possible? If so, perhaps you could get help
    from the many psychotherapists in your area who are willing to provide you with
    some help on this question.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue May 30 2000 - 16:53:48 BST