RE: Jabbering !

From: Robin Faichney (robin@faichney.demon.co.uk)
Date: Mon May 29 2000 - 16:11:45 BST

  • Next message: joana: "RE: Jabbering !"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA27389 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 29 May 2000 18:04:36 +0100
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@faichney.demon.co.uk>
    Organization: Reborn Technology
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: RE: Jabbering !
    Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 16:11:45 +0100
    X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.21]
    Content-Type: text/plain
    References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101745880@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    Message-Id: <00052916204504.00664@faichney>
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Mon, 29 May 2000, Vincent Campbell wrote:
    >Perhaps a biologist should answer this one for us, since I see your point.

    I know there are several people on this list who know more than enough
    about genetics to answer it. I just hope one of them can be bothered!

    >I remember Stephen Jones, when asked about primate rights and this
    >similarity was put to him (by a journalist), he retorted sharply that humans
    >share 75% of our genes with horses, and 50% with something else... yeast I
    >think he said, but I can't remember! Anyway, he said as a result it was a
    >specious argument.

    Steve Jones once said that philosophy is to science as pornography is to
    sex, so I wouldn't place too much importance on anything he says on
    philosophical issues.

    (I once had the chance to throw that back at him on a radio phone-in where
    the other studio guest was Mary Midgeley, the well-known philosopher, but
    I blew it, chickening out and sticking to the issue I'd spoken about to
    the researcher before the show. Ah well, I don't _know_ I'll never get
    another chance...)

    >This genetic closeness has raised issues in science fiction (e.g. The Gor
    >Saga) because humans and chimps, I believe, are close enough to inter-breed
    >(like horses and donkeys).

    My first reaction was, well how come it's never happened, but then I
    thought, maybe it has! Sheesh!

    >What I mean is that it is in the small area of difference that the
    >distinctiveness of human behaviour may reside...

    That's necessarily so, isn't it? :-)

    --
    Robin Faichney
    

    ===============================This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 29 2000 - 18:06:05 BST