RE: Meme-physics

From: Vincent Campbell (VCampbell@dmu.ac.uk)
Date: Thu 07 Nov 2002 - 09:53:44 GMT

Next message: Gordon Joly: "Re: The terrorism meme"

Previous message: Price, Ilfryn: "RE: memetics-digest V1 #1177"
Maybe in reply to: Philip Jonkers: "Meme-physics"
Next in thread: Bill Spight: "Re: electric meme bombs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Sorry Scott,

I'm a long way behind the front of the wave now, but I spotted this and thought I should apologise for this flippant remark which referred to your use of language, not the point you were making.

Vincent

>>From: Vincent Campbell <VCampbell@dmu.ac.uk>
> >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
> >To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
> >Subject: RE: Meme-physics
> >Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 12:35:26 +0100
> >
>>'insulting pink unicorns' is surely not civil behaviour....

<Please elaborate? How is it uncivil to consider the alternative possibility
> that memes are illusory constructs? "Pink unicorns" do this quite nicely.
> Maybe I should just call it "mirage".>
>
>

=============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

Next message: Gordon Joly: "Re: The terrorism meme"
Previous message: Price, Ilfryn: "RE: memetics-digest V1 #1177"
Maybe in reply to: Philip Jonkers: "Meme-physics"
Next in thread: Bill Spight: "Re: electric meme bombs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu 07 Nov 2002 - 09:59:35 GMT