RE: electric meme bombs

From: Jeremy Bradley (jeremyb@nor.com.au)
Date: Thu 07 Nov 2002 - 08:00:45 GMT

Next message: Price, Ilfryn: "RE: memetics-digest V1 #1177"

Previous message: Jeremy Bradley: "Re: Standard definition"
In reply to: Richard Brodie: "RE: electric meme bombs"
Next in thread: Van oost Kenneth: "Re: electric meme bombs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

At 03:28 PM 30/10/02 -0800, you wrote:
><<What exactly is your argument with the behavior-only meme stance? I try
>to seize it, but it vaporizes.>>
>
>I don't see how it either explains or predicts anything.
>
>Richard Brodie
>www.memecentral.com

Yes Wade, it's paper writin' time - 'Behaviour Models' for you and
'Narrative Models' for me. And I for one will be very interested in our results. Cheers Jeremy

=============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

Next message: Price, Ilfryn: "RE: memetics-digest V1 #1177"
Previous message: Jeremy Bradley: "Re: Standard definition"
In reply to: Richard Brodie: "RE: electric meme bombs"
Next in thread: Van oost Kenneth: "Re: electric meme bombs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu 07 Nov 2002 - 08:14:38 GMT