Re: Standard definition

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Sun 03 Nov 2002 - 22:40:44 GMT

  • Next message: Grant Callaghan: "Re: electric meme bombs"

    > >>If we came upon a computer and couldn't access its insides without
    > >>destroying it, could you prove that a program was running it?
    > >
    > >But, of course, this collection of pieces we now have is not the
    > >computer. And yes, it is a simple process to identify the program
    > >running in an intact computer, or the fact there is no program
    > >running.
    > >
    > >By analyzing its performance....
    > >
    > If it's such a simple process, why don't you tell us exactly how you
    > would do it? If it is running, what is running it?
    >
    > I beg to differ on the idea that the human body is not a computer.
    > Each cell in our body carries out a program contained in the DNA of
    > that cell. The brain itself is organized to handle incoming
    > information based on the structure of the body and the brain. Where
    > do you draw the line between what is a program and what is not?
    >
    > You refuse to agree that analysis of the human performance proves
    > there is anything we can call a mind but would easily accept that you
    > could do such a thing with an equally complex performance by a machine
    > that you know nothing about the internal workings of. I don't buy it.
    > The only reason you know about algorythms is because of what you do
    > know about computers. But suppose we sent something like IBM's chess
    > playing machine back in time a century or two and put it up against
    > someone like Capablanca. Would he be able to deduce just by the moves
    > it made that he was playing against a machine? I suspect he
    > wouldn't.
    >
    As aggressively as computers tend to play, he would probably suspect that he was playing Alekhine...
    >
    > Grant
    >
    > _________________________________________________________________
    > Unlimited Internet access -- and 2 months free!  Try MSN.
    > http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/2monthsfree.asp
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun 03 Nov 2002 - 22:44:38 GMT