Re: There is never pure perception or pure action

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Sun 03 Nov 2002 - 20:42:22 GMT

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Re: electric meme bombs"

    On Sunday, November 3, 2002, at 03:29 , joedees@bellsouth.net wrote:

    > Sorry Wade, but spatiotemporality inevitable entails extension. You
    > wanna see the space where I sing? Fly over here to my setting. I
    > wanna see you peme? I'd haveta fly over there. I have no doubt that
    > you perform actions, for I see their artifacts on the screen (as you see
    > mine), and likewise I have no doubt that you internally formulate same
    > (just as I do), for otherwise, your artifacts would either be absent or
    > random.

    "Let me see you peme".... Gotta love it!

    I think that all you have done, though, is expand upon the special case of the artifact.

    > PS: Since I (and supposedly you) possess self-conscious awareness,
    > don't we both engage in self-observation?

    Yeah, I'm sorta counting on that, myself.

    - Wade

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun 03 Nov 2002 - 20:46:08 GMT