Re: electric meme bombs

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Sun 03 Nov 2002 - 07:59:34 GMT

  • Next message: Van oost Kenneth: "Re: I know one when I see one"

    >
    > On Sunday, November 3, 2002, at 02:35 , joedees@bellsouth.net wrote:
    >
    > > The only way that subsequent performances could be related to
    > > previous ones would be to share a common template
    >
    > Interesting conjecture. I don't see the necessity for templates. I see
    > the necessity for commonalities, however. Aren't you denying mimicry
    > at all levels?
    >
    Of course not. When one mimics another, one internalizes one's perception of the other's performance, and then imitates it.
    >
    > How do you explain Mullerian or other mimicries?
    >
    See above.
    >
    > - Wade
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun 03 Nov 2002 - 08:03:41 GMT