From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Sun 03 Nov 2002 - 07:54:31 GMT
On Sunday, November 3, 2002, at 02:35 , joedees@bellsouth.net wrote:
> The only way that subsequent performances could be related to
> previous ones would be to share a common template
Interesting conjecture. I don't see the necessity for templates. I see
the necessity for commonalities, however. Aren't you denying mimicry at
all levels?
How do you explain Mullerian or other mimicries?
- Wade
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun 03 Nov 2002 - 07:58:24 GMT