RE: Shaving

From: havelock (havelock@tig.com.au)
Date: Fri May 26 2000 - 01:44:08 BST

  • Next message: chuck: "Re: Cui bono, Chuck?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id BAA09478 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 26 May 2000 01:45:10 +0100
    From: "havelock" <havelock@tig.com.au>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Shaving
    Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 10:44:08 +1000
    Message-ID: <LNBBJFJFCJFOIJDOGJMAGEJEEPAA.havelock@tig.com.au>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    In-Reply-To: <392D2D63.6B8B96A@mediaone.net>
    Importance: Normal
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    more on the hair....

    >
    > > >In medieval europe the beards of
    > > >vassals were grasped by lords as a sign of domination...not pacifism.
    > >
    > > Pacifism is often an acceptance of domination, at least for the moment.
    >
    > Pacifists, however, must live in a society where they are in the minority.
    > During WWII they were considered cowardly. A beard is a a
    > statement which said
    > "Don't think I am cowardly" - and hence, a "correction" if you will of the
    > peception that they are cowardly by projecting an image of power.

    It's probably a little more complex that that. I don't think the beard was
    worn to make a 'I'm not a coward statement' it was probably to seperate them
    from the social herd. It would have acted as a passive symbol of
    differentiation. Also wearing a beard in an non-hirsute society would have
    moved the individual closer to being percieved as 'western', therefore
    suspect ( quite courageous)

    I would like to think that pacificts are not a minority in any society.
    Sure the herd will follow the leader in any culture. As a species while we
    have a capacity for war we are 'generally' benign.
    Wars are started by individuals not peoples that is the nature of a
    hierachical society. It would be more acurate to say that there is a
    minortiy of people that are willing to publically display these views,
    sometimes at threat to themselves

    >
    > Frankly, however, it's a personal expression that I feel a little
    > queasy about
    > analyzing too much on a personal level. I think it would be more
    > fruitful to
    > look at social trends in different societies.
    >

    aren't social trends identified by enumerating 'personal expression' - isn't
    this a memetic list? you know any meme is copied by imitation...

    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 26 2000 - 01:45:41 BST