Re: Standard definition

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Wed 30 Oct 2002 - 21:09:21 GMT

  • Next message: Jeremy Bradley: "Re: Standard definition"

    >
    > On Wednesday, October 30, 2002, at 01:34 , joedees@bellsouth.net
    > wrote:
    >
    > > a choice not to behave in
    > > a certain way, and not a behavior in and of itself
    >
    > This is also behavior, in and of itself. I cannot fathom why you
    > persist in defining it as 'not behavior'.
    >
    > Then again, I didn't hear you sing, either, and that _is_ not a
    > behavior.
    >
    > - Wade
    >
    Sitting is sitting; it is not 'not walking'.
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed 30 Oct 2002 - 21:13:30 GMT