Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id GAA02372 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 25 May 2000 06:20:28 +0100 Subject: Re: Shaving Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 01:17:43 -0400 x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu> To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <20000525051743.AAA16263@camailp.harvard.edu@[204.96.32.175]> Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
>I'm
>pretty sure there is a history of beards - it may be mixed in with clothing.
There is really only one reason I wear a beard, and have, since I could,
which has been about 30 years now.
And it is an old reason.
And, as far as I know, it is historically correct.
And the reason is this- Alexander was the first to command that his
soldiers shave their beards, since having a beard provided an enemy, in
the type of close quarter fighting that was common with swords and hand
weapons, a purchase, a handle, especially to raise the chin for the
purpose of throat cutting. So, a soldier in Alexander's army was
close-shaven.
And so, to me, the beard has always been the mark of the pacifist.
And that is why I wear one.
- Wade
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 25 2000 - 06:21:04 BST