Re: What is "useful"; what is "survival"

From: chuck (cpalson@mediaone.net)
Date: Wed May 24 2000 - 17:01:07 BST

  • Next message: Joe E. Dees: "Re: Why are human brains bigger?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id WAA29262 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 24 May 2000 22:03:24 +0100
    Message-ID: <392BFCC3.5772C868@mediaone.net>
    Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 17:01:07 +0100
    From: chuck <cpalson@mediaone.net>
    X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (WinNT; I)
    X-Accept-Language: en
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: What is "useful"; what is "survival"
    References: <20000524133054.AAA16112@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    "Wade T.Smith" wrote:

    > On 05/24/00 06:49, Vincent Campbell said this-
    >
    > >(The point about seppuku, was that this is a ritual behaviour that has
    > >persisted for many generations explicitly involving suicide- how do you
    > >explain it?)
    >
    > Perhaps with the same breath that explains Clinton's _not_ performing
    > such a ceremony in the face of precisely a situation in which the
    > nipponese culture would demand it.

    >
    > Which is to say, there is no simple explanation for the strength of a
    > culture or the directions is allows.
    >

    You missed my point, Wade. The difference is to what extent reputation plays
    a role in each society because of ecological conditions. In this country, if
    you get a bad reputation in one town, you can simply move to another town or
    state, set up residence by showing your bank account, and start anew. Ask
    any European who has moved here, and they will tell you they are astonished
    by this -- and usually love it (although perhaps academics are out of the
    loop). In a land short country like Japan where people must stay in one
    place, they don't have that option. That is why the stain generally lasts
    and is far more serious than here.

    Actually, I should substitute the word land for resources for modern
    industrial societies. I have tested this out cross culturally and it has
    works every time. This continuum seems to work in the orient also as well
    as within the US. I know of no people that relies less on reputation to
    evaluate their countrymen, and it is a defining characteristic of our
    mentality.

    And, yes there are explanations for the strength of *every* cultural traits
    because the culture of a people is its tool kit for living, not simply a
    pretty thing to wear or eat. Most social scientists simply assume there are
    no explanations for certain things and don't try to investigate any further.
    Just about everyone on this listserv, for example, believes this as a matter
    of faith. The most recent such investigator is Fukuyama who states outright
    that 20% of culture is free variation, a figure he pulls out of the air
    without being challenged.

    >
    > - Wade
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 24 2000 - 22:04:23 BST