Re: electric meme bombs

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Thu 17 Oct 2002 - 05:11:11 GMT

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Re: electric meme bombs"

    >
    > On Wednesday, October 16, 2002, at 11:09 , joedees@bellsouth.net
    > wrote:
    >
    > > Yep, and one you yourself have denied as you keep insisting that
    > > every token instance of a behavior type is unique.
    >
    > Again I miss the distinction of this type/token thingee.
    >
    > I do insist that every behavior is unique, and thus every beme.
    >
    > What am I denying?
    >
    > - Wade
    >
    >
    That there is such a thing as a second tree ( for under your rubric, every tree has to have its own, nonrelational name).
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu 17 Oct 2002 - 05:16:11 GMT