Re: electric meme bombs

From: Wade Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Wed 16 Oct 2002 - 19:30:33 GMT

  • Next message: Grant Callaghan: "Re: electric meme bombs"

    On Wednesday, October 16, 2002, at 02:56 , joedees@bellsouth.net wrote:

    > It is the only possible commonality between multiple performances of
    > the same behavior by a single individual.

    Repetition is not dependent upon latency.

    Twitches are multiple performances of the same behavior. So are habits. We have already dismissed these from memetic behaviors.

    Besides... there is no such thing as identical performances. Song1 is not Song2. This is the very essence of cultural change.

    Memes do not evolve, they are each unique performances, utilizing similar and preponderant preparations.

    Each car from a factory is unique, but, because the factory is made to produce a near identical artifact, each one gets the same name, i.e. Cadillac Eldorado, and is recognized as such, but you would not drive another's. The commonality between them is the factory. Memes are behaviors produced by memeplexes (factories), in our case humans within a shared culture behaving.

    - Wade

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed 16 Oct 2002 - 19:35:30 GMT