Re: Red, tooth and claw (was media and violence)

From: Philip Jonkers (philipjonkers@prodigy.net)
Date: Tue Apr 30 2002 - 17:02:56 BST

  • Next message: Philip Jonkers: "Re: Red, tooth and claw (was media and violence)"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id RAA17446 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 30 Apr 2002 17:15:32 +0100
    Message-ID: <002a01c1f060$7fa60d40$5e2ffea9@oemcomputer>
    From: "Philip Jonkers" <philipjonkers@prodigy.net>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    References: <570E2BEE7BC5A34684EE5914FCFC368C10FC7F@fillan.stir.ac.uk>
    Subject: Re: Red, tooth and claw (was media and violence)
    Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 09:02:56 -0700
    Organization: Prodigy Internet
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
    X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Vincent Campbell" <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 2:22 AM
    Subject: Red, tooth and claw (was media and violence)

    > >>Compared to that, there aren't many fierce predators (didn't
    > someone
    > >> write a book called something like 'why big, fierce animals are
    > scarce'?).
    >
    > <No offense, but I beg to differ. Even the vegans among us are
    > slayers (of
    > > veggies).>
    > >
    > Don't worry, I'm not going to jump on you like Bill Benzon did! (BTW
    > I'm not going to get involved in that one, apart from saying that I see
    > Bill's wider point, but that's not what you were saying, nor do I think
    his
    > term for you was appropriate. It's not like him to be so terse).

    I don't disagree with him when he says that it's a dirty world out there but
    that's
    simply not what I'm saying in that posting.

    > Similarly here, I know what yo mean, but still some veggies and
    > fruits don't "mind" being eaten though- indeed isn't that the purpose, in
    > order to get seeds widely distributed? I wonder if plants that bear fruit
    > would, if sentient and able to talk, would be like that animal in the
    > Restaurant at the End of the Universe that wants to be eaten? (Arthur Dent
    > says that's disgusting, to which the retort comes, better than eating an
    > animal that doesn't want to be eaten).

    I agree mechanisms have evolved in which plants proliferate and disperse
    better
    if their seeds and the like that have to be eaten.

    Phil.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 30 2002 - 17:27:20 BST