Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id WAA07852 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 25 Apr 2002 22:26:27 +0100 X-Originating-IP: [194.117.133.84] User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/9.0.2509 Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 22:17:55 +0100 Subject: RE: memetics-digest V1 #1023 From: Steve Drew <srdrew_1@hotmail.com> To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Message-ID: <B8EE2DE3.17B%srdrew_1@hotmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200204240945.KAA04987@alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk> Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Apr 2002 21:20:33.0290 (UTC) FILETIME=[08B1A6A0:01C1EC9F] Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Hi Lawrence
> Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 09:57:57 -0400
> From: "Lawrence DeBivort" <debivort@umd5.umd.edu>
> Subject: RE: memetics-digest V1 #1023
>
>> Steve Drew:
>> I think [advertisers] have learned the 'cruder' techniques such as the
> 'sex sells'
>> example you mentioned. I don't think it is because they are that good, but
>> that they stick to ones that have been useful in the past. The
>> problem they
>> face is that everyone's responses are different, and IMO they have not
>> developed enough ideas on how to overcome this yet, but if they do then I
>> agree that things could get rough.
>
>
> And that is one of the reasons we should be wary of turning memetics into a
> technology and releasing it publicly. I consider this list a public forum.
>
> Lawrence
It is indeed. Unfortunately Pandora is still around, and so are the people
who would open the box, including me and thee?
Regards
Steve
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Apr 25 2002 - 22:38:09 BST