Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id VAA01159 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 22 May 2000 21:43:28 +0100 From: "Richard Brodie" <richard@brodietech.com> To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Subject: RE: Central questions of memetics Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 13:40:53 -0700 Message-ID: <NBBBIIDKHCMGAIPMFFPJAELLENAA.richard@brodietech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 In-Reply-To: <391FDD41.E0002DF2@mediaone.net> Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
[Wade]
> Actually, in the sense of Dennett's algorithms, I see no need, in
> evolution, for the term 'useful'. Things are useful when there is a need
> for them and they perform a function- they are no longer 'useful' when
> those conditions alter or dissipate, although they could exist in full
> form at both times. 'Useful' is a temporal condition.
[Chuck]
<<I have no problem with this statement. And it has nothing to do with the
fact that Wade lives in the same town! Except for one thing - they cannot
exist for long when they are no longer useful - as the second part of the
statement seems to imply. What happens in history is that the same forms
will find new uses. That, for example, is the history of words - how they
take on new meanings.>>
Is "having a use" the same thing, in your model, as "being useful"? I can
think of uses for the dead batteries my digital camera makes, but I wouldn't
call them "useful." I do not understand, from reading your posts, how you
think ideas---or words---evolve if not by mutation, selection and
replication. I asked before, do you think there is a committee deciding how
words will be used and enforcing that somehow? If not, then you agree with
the brunt of memetics. Now I just have to show you that the word "useful" in
relation to memes is---well---not very useful. ;-)
Richard Brodie richard@brodietech.com
http://www.memecentral.com/rbrodie.htm
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon May 22 2000 - 21:43:54 BST