Re: media violence

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Thu Apr 18 2002 - 17:06:36 BST

  • Next message: Bill Spight: "Re: Subliminal advertising"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id RAA23783 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 18 Apr 2002 17:12:39 +0100
    Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 12:06:36 -0400
    Subject: Re: media violence
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
    From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    In-Reply-To: <570E2BEE7BC5A34684EE5914FCFC368C10FC4B@fillan.stir.ac.uk>
    Message-Id: <42466BF8-52E6-11D6-A1A2-003065B9A95A@harvard.edu>
    X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.481)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Thursday, April 18, 2002, at 10:30 , Vincent Campbell wrote:

    > the
    > problem of media effects is not that there aren't any, but that too many
    > people think they know what they are, how they work, and how to achieve
    > particular effects with particular strategies, and they all seem rather
    > flawed in that assumption IMHO.

    There's the nutshell.

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Apr 18 2002 - 18:30:56 BST