Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id AAA21556 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 18 Apr 2002 00:37:18 +0100 From: "Lawrence DeBivort" <debivort@umd5.umd.edu> To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Subject: RE: Bush's War on Terrorism Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 19:04:53 -0400 Message-ID: <NEBBKOADILIOKGDJLPMAKEJHCOAA.debivort@umd5.umd.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 In-Reply-To: <F288Rqf69aZbLAX3cf30001f996@hotmail.com> Importance: Normal Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Thanks for the thoughtful post, Scott. What is the Weinberger doctrine?
> I watched "Politically Incorrect" with Bill Maher last night and
> have come
> to the concusion that we in the US do have a deep set tendency to
> view that
> conflict through the lenses of pro-Israeli sentiment. It's hard for us to
> see the Palestinian POV. It seemed from some of Dubya's rhetoric and
> Powell's stances that the US would have a more neutral or even-handed
> approach. If we can't be neutral, this matter needs to rest
> solely with the
> U.N. The US does NOT need to commit our forces to that region as
> peacekeepers. I don't think we've got the necessary objectivity, plus I'm
> for commitments more in line with the Weinberger doctrine.
t
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Apr 18 2002 - 00:56:04 BST