Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA09566 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 12 Apr 2002 12:21:14 +0100 Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 07:15:09 -0400 Subject: Re: Re Grammar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu> To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <C4C20D0AEF0BF84B90CFEA0105EEB0BD0159C186@selene.shu.ac.uk> Message-Id: <8CB4FF62-4E06-11D6-9809-003065B9A95A@harvard.edu> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.481) Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
On Friday, April 12, 2002, at 04:26 , Price, Ilfryn wrote:
> the variety of vocalisation we can make, and other primate species
> cannot,
Interesting. I would have perhaps said just the opposite, that we are
not that different, nor others as limited, as we might think.
Has there really been a study of the disparity and the greater range of
vocalizations possible in homo sapiens, compared with, for example, some
of the gibbons?
- Wade
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 12 2002 - 12:33:44 BST