RE: Re Grammar

From: Vincent Campbell (v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk)
Date: Fri Apr 12 2002 - 10:40:12 BST

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Re: Re Grammar"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id KAA09446 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 12 Apr 2002 10:48:05 +0100
    Message-ID: <570E2BEE7BC5A34684EE5914FCFC368C10FC18@fillan.stir.ac.uk>
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Re Grammar
    Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 10:40:12 +0100
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
    X-Filter-Info: UoS MailScan 0.1 [D 1]
    X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Isn't this a bit like the evolution of wings argument? (or eyes for that
    matter?) The idea that an "incomplete" version of some physical
    characteristic is useless so things like wings couldn't have evolved (as,
    believe it or not, my biology teacher once argued about the eye). For
    insects I believe rudimentary wings may have had some heat control function,
    which later as a side effect, if you like, became useful for flight.

    For language isn't there the problem of the human larynx position in babies,
    which can block the airway, but needs to be there so that as we get older it
    allows us to make the complex sounds for language? I mean problem here not
    for evolutionary theory, simply in the sense of infant survival rates as a
    pay off for the adaptive advantage of language.

    Does any of that have anything to do with grammar.... probably not.

    Vincent

    > ----------
    > From: Price, Ilfryn
    > Reply To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 9:26 AM
    > To: Memetics List (E-mail)
    > Subject: RE: Re Grammar
    >
    > It works once you have language but Morgan's argument in the Aquatic Ape
    > Hypothesis (sorry my copy of the book is in a crate at the moment so no
    > detailed references) is that the variety of vocalisation we can make, and
    > other primate species cannot, is only possible because of a particular
    > arrangment of the respiratory and digestive systems. How did that get
    > selected pre-language. A breathing explanation seems more plausible.
    >
    > If
    >
    > Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 06:30:51 -0700
    >
    > From: "Richard Brodie" <richard@brodietech.com>
    >
    > Subject: RE: Re Grammar
    >
    > The straightforward explanation is that language allows communication of
    > important survival information both in the moment and from old to new
    > generations.
    >
    >
    > If Price
    > Facilities Management Graduate Centre
    > Sheffield Hallam University
    > Unit 7 Science Park
    > Sheffield S1 1WB
    > T +44 (0)114 225 4032
    > F +44 (0)114 225 4038
    > M +44 (0)7976 422354
    > http/www/shu.ac.uk/schools/sed/fmgc
    > http://www.occupier.org <http://www.occupier.org/>
    > http://members.aol.com/ifprice/ifresch.html
    >
    >
    > ==============================================================This was
    > distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    -- 
    The University of Stirling is a university established in Scotland by
    charter at Stirling, FK9 4LA.  Privileged/Confidential Information may
    be contained in this message.  If you are not the addressee indicated
    in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such
    person), you may not disclose, copy or deliver this message to anyone
    and any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
    prohibited and may be unlawful.  In such case, you should destroy this
    message and kindly notify the sender by reply email.  Please advise
    immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email
    for messages of this kind.  Opinions, conclusions and other
    information in this message that do not relate to the official
    business of the University of Stirling shall be understood as neither
    given nor endorsed by it.
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Apr 12 2002 - 11:00:08 BST