Re: memetics-digest V1 #1011

From: Scott Chase (ecphoric@hotmail.com)
Date: Tue Apr 09 2002 - 04:49:23 BST

  • Next message: Grant Callaghan: "Re: memetics-digest V1 #1011"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id EAA03066 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 9 Apr 2002 04:55:35 +0100
    X-Originating-IP: [209.240.222.132]
    From: "Scott Chase" <ecphoric@hotmail.com>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: memetics-digest V1 #1011
    Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2002 23:49:23 -0400
    Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
    Message-ID: <F36AUfKRfcjcMzfoV1q0001f046@hotmail.com>
    X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Apr 2002 03:49:23.0357 (UTC) FILETIME=[89799CD0:01C1DF79]
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    >From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
    >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >Subject: Re: memetics-digest V1 #1011
    >Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 19:52:42 -0400
    >
    >
    >On Monday, April 8, 2002, at 07:30 , Scott Chase wrote:
    >
    >>(bq) "My experiment consists of asking you to *observe*, here and now.
    >>I hope you are all co-operating, and observing! However, I fear that at
    >>least some of you, instead of observing, will feel a strong urge to
    >>ask: 'WHAT do you want me to observe?'" (eq)
    >
    >This quote directly supports _my_ thesis that proper 'observation' is a
    >non-filtered act.
    >
    >When you ask 'WHAT?' you are supplying bias, _'instead of observing'_.
    >(As it notes above.)
    >
    No. The gist is how you could possibly make an observation without a notion
    of *what* to observe.
    >
    >As for Sherlock, he was often wont to say that people just don't see
    >what is in front of them, precisely because of their preconceptions. His
    >deductive reasoning was always applied _after_ he absorbed, like a
    >hungry sponge, every possible thing he possibly could, precisely
    >_because_ he wasn't wondering _WHAT_ he was looking for....
    >
    >Yes?
    >
    >
    Was Holmes one of those intuitional types? I'm not a Doyle buff, but
    intuition does come to mind for some reason.

    _________________________________________________________________
    Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
    http://www.hotmail.com

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 09 2002 - 05:09:15 BST