Re: memetics-digest V1 #1011

From: Wade Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Mon Apr 08 2002 - 19:56:16 BST

  • Next message: Wade Smith: "Re: memetics-digest V1 #1011" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id UAA02198 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 8 Apr 2002 20:02:44 +0100
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 14:56:16 -0400
Subject: Re: memetics-digest V1 #1011
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
From: Wade Smith <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <F287GIUUJlNK9W1IpMK00004752@hotmail.com>
Message-Id: <4DFCE1F6-4B22-11D6-A7EE-003065A0F24C@harvard.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.481)
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    On Monday, April 8, 2002, at 02:22 , Scott Chase wrote:

    > How can someone make "pure" unfiltered observations when we are
    > beset and preset by biases from the sense organs upward to our
    > conceptual categories?

    Of course, we cannot make omni-spectral observations, but we can
    make 'unmemetic' observations, and do.

    I fail to see your point here, or see that we are in any state
    of disagreement.

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Apr 08 2002 - 20:13:49 BST