Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA18688 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 2 Apr 2002 13:22:35 +0100 Message-ID: <000b01c1d91f$7a1b2f20$5603aace@oemcomputer> From: "Philip Jonkers" <philipjonkers@prodigy.net> To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> References: <F5AO2Rpy9tMTF4ia5wA00000408@hotmail.com> <000d01c1d699$b7ea23c0$856c4518@no.shawcable.net> Subject: To be or not to be: memetics a science? Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 16:48:28 -0900 Organization: Prodigy Internet Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Boy are we quiet out there or what? Here's an issue for you guys to ponder
about
and hopefully to revive the list a little.
Is memetics a science? That is: a systematic study about the structure and
behavior of the physical
world consisting of theory as well as experiment. If not (yet), does it has
what it takes to
ever become one? Or are the variables involved too complex to be isolated
for experimental
study and will it thus remain a theory without the possibility of testing
the things it predicts and implies?
Your opinions of whatever kind are gladly appreciated. So: What Say You?
Phil.
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Apr 02 2002 - 14:08:37 BST