Re: is forgetting adaptive?

From: Simos Kitiris (sk288@hermes.cam.ac.uk)
Date: Mon Mar 11 2002 - 00:32:59 GMT

  • Next message: Ned Wolpert: "Re: Rumsfeld Says He May Drop New Office of Influence"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id AAA01433 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 11 Mar 2002 00:38:27 GMT
    Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 00:32:59 +0000 (GMT)
    From: Simos Kitiris <sk288@hermes.cam.ac.uk>
    X-X-Sender:  <sk288@green.csi.cam.ac.uk>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: Re: is forgetting adaptive?
    Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.33.0203102305250.27418-100000@green.csi.cam.ac.uk>
    Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    >In the short-term it might be good for me to recall that I have some
    frozen
    >dinners in my freezer so that later I can cook a meal. The ability to
    >maintain this short-term information may have long-term survival
    advantages
    >harkening back to ancestors that needed to recall momentary sources of
    food
    >or caches on the savannah. OTOH, would it do me any good to remember that
    I
    >had a particular brand of frozen microwavable dinner in my freezer back
    say
    >10 years ago? Would it do me any good to painstakingly recall every
    package
    >of microwavable dinner I had ever retrieved from my refrigerator? Maybe
    the
    >basic ideas that I can buy these dinners at various local supermarkets
    and
    >that I have recently stored them in the freezer would suffice. In the
    >ancestral environment, likewise, it may have been advantageous to
    remember
    >that certain areas were where food had often been stored in the past, but
    >not the explicit details of every cache. Would it do the savannah dweller
    >any good to remember that particular cache from 10 years ago when there
    are
    >more recent caches to recall?
    >
    >If something is no longer current or pressing, why remember it? Wouldn't
    it
    >be better for this memory (or at least its particulars) to recede,
    allowing
    >space for newer, more pertinent, information?
    >

    Just as an aside... I think that there must be an even more high-level
    initial screaning to the information that actually reaches your memory;
    if you think about it the examples that you give seem like pre-processed
    information. By that I mean
    that our brain classifies some relatively important information as
    'events', 'locations' etc. Remembering for example every microwavable meal
    that we've eaten, is actually not a lot of information if you consider
    other sources of information inflow; our eyes alone, give a data rate of
    about 3 Gbytes/s!
    Our memory can't possibly cope with that kind of information inflow; most
    of this information is just simply discarded (well, perhaps not discarded
    but just has a very very short 'expiry time-stamp' if that helps in
    relating this to what Daniel Schacter says) on the spot and there is an
    obvious evolutionary advantage to anyone that can perform this initial
    screaning effectively and keep only information that will be of use later
    on - extending this I would say that the same applies to the reduction of
    memory as function of time. As Grant pointed
    out 'There has to be a way for a finite brain to deal with infinite
    amounts of information about the world we live in.' - to that i'd like to
    add that it's not only a matter of capacity; the brain also seems to have
    a constraint regarding the rate at which new information is stored (this
    probably has to do with biological processes but i have no clue about
    those). Memorising 10 new phone numbers in one minute seems like an
    really hard task, whereas the brain obviously has the capacity of
    remembering them... I wonder if forgetting specific things with time helps
    to improve this maximum rate, apart from the actual capacity. (ie does
    having less stored information in your brain increase the maximum rate of
    storing new information?)
    What i also find interesting is the way events (and generally information)
    is time stamped; why is it that after a period of time, although the
    information is still somewhere in our memory, we might need much longer to recall it?
    That might shed some more light into this but I guess
    that is another story...

    Simos

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Mar 11 2002 - 00:48:50 GMT