RE: Rumsfeld Says He May Drop New Office of Influence

From: Vincent Campbell (v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk)
Date: Thu Mar 07 2002 - 16:12:15 GMT

  • Next message: Lawrence DeBivort: "RE: Rumsfeld Says He May Drop New Office of Influence: Israel and Palestine"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id QAA25042 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 7 Mar 2002 16:18:22 GMT
    Message-ID: <570E2BEE7BC5A34684EE5914FCFC368C10FB9E@fillan>
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Rumsfeld Says He May Drop New Office of Influence
    Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 16:12:15 -0000 
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    X-Filter-Info: UoS MailScan 0.1 [D 1]
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    >>I don't believe I actually did any name-calling, only expressed
    the
    >>view that there is a tendency to over-celebrate indigenous peoples
    out of
    >>guilt over past atrocities committed against them.

            <Vincent
    > The above sentence contains the intimation that those who would espouse
    > the
    > rights of indigenous Australians are guilt ridden, bleeding-hearted
    > do-gooders (all derogatory terms in my country).>
    >
            I didn't say 'bleeding-hearted' or 'do-gooders', I simply indicated
    that the judging of peoples due to historically generated guilt is
    problematic.

    >> But that doesn't allow one to view peoples with rose-tinted
    glasses.

            <Ah, rose-tinted glasses, does not this call the wearer of such
    naively stupid?>

            No. I don't think people who do this are naive or stupid, only that
    they are interpreting peoples in an emotionally biased way, which is
    problematic.

            <And here's the old meme that promulgates the nonsense that
    'writing' is the
    > only form of reliably recording history (I won't go into the numerous
    > contrary examples).>
    >
            I didn't say that, only that oral tradition is problematic which it
    is.

            <Besides the oral evidence, which includes a virulent
    > mythscape and an oral tradition which is arguably more reliable than the
    > manipulated and subjective texts on which we modern folk place so much
    > trust, there is an historical record of great antiquity in cave art.>
    >
            You don't think accounts passed down from person to person through
    oral communication are subjective?

            < In the literature I have read, and in the seminars, programs and
    discussions I
    > have heard and/or participated in, I have heard no serious suggestion that
    > mindless masacre of people occurred in this country before European
    > invasion.>
    >
            Who said anything about 'mindless' masscres? I'm talking about
    sytematic territorial disputes that have historically occurred in all human
    societies. You're adding emotional emphasis to my points that are not
    there, or intended.

            <If you would like to see Cpt. Cook's and Govenor Philip's orders go
    to
    > foundingdocs.gov.au , and for comment on the existing International Law of
    > the time look for Blackstone's commentaries of 1740 or thereabouts (this
    > is
    > not the title but if you search your libraries DB I'm sure that you will
    > find it.>
    >
            I'm not disputing what the colonists did- there's a record of it for
    a start.

            <The appeal is not so much that I, or they for that matter, would
    like to
    > revert to an ancient way of life, it is more that they were not suicidal
    > in
    > the way that we modern industrial-age products are. Each society is
    > different in many ways of course and I will not be drawn further into
    > generalisations.>
    >
            You contradict yourself a little here.

            <Ah Vincent, at least I can find one sentence with which I can
    agree.
    > Yours - stirred but not shaken
    > Jeremy>
    >
            As I originally said, I wasn't attempting to annoy anyone, not
    deliberately anyway.

            Vincent

    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >
    >

    -- 
    The University of Stirling is a university established in Scotland by
    charter at Stirling, FK9 4LA.  Privileged/Confidential Information may
    be contained in this message.  If you are not the addressee indicated
    in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such
    person), you may not disclose, copy or deliver this message to anyone
    and any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
    prohibited and may be unlawful.  In such case, you should destroy this
    message and kindly notify the sender by reply email.  Please advise
    immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email
    for messages of this kind.  Opinions, conclusions and other
    information in this message that do not relate to the official
    business of the University of Stirling shall be understood as neither
    given nor endorsed by it.
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 07 2002 - 16:28:36 GMT