Re: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Mon Feb 18 2002 - 00:53:53 GMT

  • Next message: Richard Brodie: "RE: Words and memes: criteria for acceptance of new belief or meme"
  • Next message: Joe Dees: "RE: Re:" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id AAA02235 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 18 Feb 2002 00:59:08 GMT
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2002 19:53:53 -0500
Subject: Re: draft abstract Sex, Drugs and Cults
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <000901c1b7e9$7f519300$12afeb3e@default>
Message-Id: <FAEDD716-2409-11D6-8DEC-003065B9A95A@harvard.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.480)
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    >> I would like to add that every activity that is rewarded can be
    >> addictive.
    >> Attention (from cults) is particularly rewarding

    One of the reasons alternative (quack) medicine is popular is because
    the practitioners (con-artists) are _attentive_ to the patient (mark).

    The fact that such treatments (snake-oils) are non-curative, is just
    another example of memetic behavior being antagonistic to survival.

    Adherents to quackery are most definitely showing cultish behavior.

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Feb 18 2002 - 04:27:41 GMT