Re: Fwd: Did language drive society or vice versa?

From: Bill Spight (bspight@pacbell.net)
Date: Fri May 12 2000 - 19:39:10 BST

  • Next message: Bill Spight: "Re: Central questions of memetics"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id VAA02044 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 12 May 2000 21:38:27 +0100
    Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 11:39:10 -0700
    From: Bill Spight <bspight@pacbell.net>
    Subject: Re: Fwd: Did language drive society or vice versa?
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Message-id: <391C4FCE.8CEEAA2@pacbell.net>
    Organization: Saybrook Graduate School
    X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en]C-PBI-NC404  (Win95; I)
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
    X-Accept-Language: ja,en
    References: <20000511200148.AAA25731%camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Dear Wade,

    > But the advent of language _is_ a distinction.
    >
    > What _will_ we do with that?

    I was an undergraduate when the question of whether other animals
    have language was being hotly debated. At first it was said that
    animals had signs and signals, but not symbols, and symbols were
    what defined language. Later it was admitted that some animals
    had symbols, but they could not combine symbols, and the
    combination of symbols defined language. Gradually the defenders
    of the idea that language is unique to humans gave ground, but
    redefined language at each step. To me the whole exercise was
    theological, like the question of whether animals have souls.

    Today the debate is less heated, and the facts are somewhat
    clearer. Human communication is vastly different from that of
    other species, but some of them are capable of much more
    sophisticated communication than was originally supposed. That is
    what is important, isn't it? Not what we want to call language.

    Similar debates occur about whether animals have memes. I think
    that this is a side track that is just as fruitless as the debate
    about animal language. It is a question of definition, ultimately
    undecidable, and not worth the trouble.

    Best,

    Bill

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri May 12 2000 - 21:39:21 BST